4.6 Review

Rice and cold stress: methods for its evaluation and summary of cold tolerance-related quantitative trait loci

Journal

RICE
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/s12284-014-0024-3

Keywords

Cold tolerance; Physiological metabolites; Evaluation criteria; QTL; Oryza sativa

Categories

Funding

  1. National Transgenic Project [2012ZX08009001]
  2. National 973 Project [2012CB723000]
  3. National 863 Project [2014AA10A604]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31071674, 31371927]
  5. State Key Laboratory Breeding Base for Zhejiang Sustainable Pest and Disease Control [2010DS700124-KF1210]
  6. Hunan Province University Innovation Platform Open Fund Project [10 K031]
  7. Program for Innovative Research Teams in University [IRT1239]
  8. Aid Program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province
  9. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Innovation and Utilization [11KFXM01]
  10. Hunan Agricultural University [11YJ13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cold stress adversely affects rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth and productivity, and has so far determined its geographical distribution. Dissecting cold stress-mediated physiological changes and understanding their genetic causes will facilitate the breeding of rice for cold tolerance. Here, we review recent progress in research on cold stress-mediated physiological traits and metabolites, and indicate their roles in the cold-response network and cold-tolerance evaluation. We also discuss criteria for evaluating cold tolerance and evaluate the scope and shortcomings of each application. Moreover, we summarize research on quantitative trait loci (QTL) related to cold stress at the germination, seedling, and reproductive stages that should provide useful information to accelerate progress in breeding cold-tolerant rice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available