4.6 Article

Deep and Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Rice Plants Infested by the Beet Armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) and Water Weevil (Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus)

Journal

RICE
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 22-35

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12284-010-9037-8

Keywords

Beet armyworm; Water weevil; MPSS; SBS; Transcriptome analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [0321437, 0701745]
  2. Arkansas Rice Research and Promotion Board
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [0321437] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [0701745] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) and the rice water weevil (Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus) are two important insect pests in rice production. To identify insect-responsive genes in rice, we performed a deep transcriptome analysis of Nipponbare rice leaves infested with both beet armyworm and water weevil using massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS). Many antisense, alternative, and novel transcripts were commonly and specifically induced and suppressed in the infested tissue. Key genes involved in the defense metabolic pathways such as salicylic acid and jasmonic acid biosynthesis pathways were up-regulated in the infested leaves. To validate the MPSS results, we analyzed the transcriptome of the rice leaves infested with water weevils using Solexa's sequencing-by-synthesis (SBS) method. The MPSS and SBS data were highly correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient=0.85), and 83% of genes had similar gene expression in both libraries. Our comprehensive and in-depth survey of the insect-infested libraries provides a rich genomic resource for further analyzing the function of key regulatory genes involved in insect resistance in rice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available