4.3 Article

Profound Vitamin D Deficiency in a Diverse Group of Women during Pregnancy Living in a Sun-Rich Environment at Latitude 32 degrees N

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 2010, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2010/917428

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Thrasher Research Fund
  2. GCRC/CTRC
  3. NIH [RR01070]
  4. Division of Neonatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR001070] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Determine prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) in a diverse group of women presenting for obstetrical care at two community health centers in South Carolina at latitude 32 degrees N. Methods and Design: Any pregnant woman presenting for care at 2 community health centers was eligible to participate. Sociodemographic and clinical history were recorded. A single blood sample was taken to measure circulating 25(OH) D as indicator of vitamin D status [25(OH) D < 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L deficiency; < 32 ng/mL (80 nmol/L) insufficiency]. Total serum calcium, phosphorus, creatinine, and intact parathyroid hormone also were measured. Results: 559 women, [mean age 25.0 perpendicular to 5.4 (range 14-43) years] participated: African American (48%), Hispanic (38%), Caucasian/Other (14%). Mean gestational age was 18.5 +/- 8.4 (median 14.6, range 6.4-39.6) weeks' gestation. 48% were VDD; an additional 37% insufficient. Greatest degree was in the African American women (68% deficient; 94% insufficient). In multivariable regression, 25(OH)D retained a significant negative association with PTH (P < .001). Conclusions: VDD was high in a diverse group of women, greatest in those of darker pigmentation. The negative correlation between 25(OH)D and PTH confirms their corroborative use as biomarkers of VDD. These findings raise the issue of adequacy of current vitamin D recommendations for pregnant women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available