4.1 Review

Genetic disorders of the pituitary

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32834ed639

Keywords

combined pituitary hormone deficiency; fibroblast growth factor 8; GLI2; HESX1; LHX3; LHX4; PITX2; Prophet of Pit-1; SOX3

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [SF32DK08965, K11 DK02329, R03 DK56157]
  2. Endocrine Fellows Foundation
  3. Charles H. Hood Foundation
  4. Genentech Foundation for Growth and Development
  5. Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society
  6. Women In Endocrinology to present her research at national meetings

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review To discuss pituitary development and function related to those factors in which molecular defects resulting in combined pituitary hormone deficiency have been described in humans, and to describe recently reported novel mutations in these factors (January 2010 to September 2011). Recent findings Novel mutations have been found in transcription factors involved in pituitary development, HESX1; LHX3; LHX4; SOX3; Prophet of Pit-1; and POU1FI, and in some of the signaling molecules expressed in the ventral diencephalon (fibroblast growth factor 8 and GLI2). There is phenotypic variability for the same mutation suggesting variable penetrance due to other genetic, epigenetic, or environmental factors. The incidence of mutations in these factors is low suggesting that other genes or environmental factors are responsible for the majority of cases of combined pituitary hormone deficiency. Summary Development of the pituitary gland and pituitary cell determination and specification depend on the expression and interaction of signaling molecules and transcription factors in overlapping, but distinct, spatial and temporal patterns. Studying genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with mutations in these factors give insight into the mechanisms involved in normal pituitary development and function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available