4.6 Article

Capillary number encouraged the construction of smart biomimetic eyes

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 3, Issue 23, Pages 5896-5902

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5tc00270b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of china [51427805, 91323303, 51275400, 51305337, 51405376, 51405372, 61404103]
  2. National Science and Technology Project [2011ZX04014071, SK201401A53-01, CERS-1-X1]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2013JQ7021]
  4. Fundamental & Advanced Research Project of Chongqing [cstc2013jcyjC00001]
  5. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Successful integration of advanced semiconductor devices with biological systems has greatly accelerated fundamental scientific discovery. In view of imaging/illumination applications, a facile and high-yield strategy is thus highly desirable for fabricating biomimetic eyes bearing the advantages of insects' compound eyes and the human eye. In this work, the capillary number, determining the viscous-capillary balance, is controlled to construct life-sized biomimetic eyes with a large field-of-view (FOV) and superior varifocal capability. These proposed biomimetic eyes of similar to 800 honeycomb-patterned liquid microlenses omnidirectionally arranged along a hemispherical polymer dome, which has a wide FOV (up to 160 degrees) similar to an insect's compound eye. The imitative ommatidia are realized by a liquid microlens array, which autonomously responds to the capillary number and thus exhibits an excellent varifocal ranging from 28 mm to 145 mm. This optical system, by means of the controllable capillary number, successfully produces a high-resolution and visible output signal. Herein, our work paves a new avenue for adaptive optical systems with a large FOV and an outstanding varifocal capability in compact setups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available