Journal
BMC NEPHROLOGY
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-1045-8
Keywords
Ferric carboxymaltose; Iron sucrose; Hemodialysis; Iron status; ESA
Categories
Funding
- Vifor Pharma
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Although the efficacy of iron sucrose (IS) and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in treating anemia in hemodialysis (HD) patients has been studied individually, a comparison of these two intravenous iron formulations has not yet been performed in HD patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective audit on records of 221 stable HD patients from different HD centers in the Netherlands, who were switched from IS to FCM on a 1: 1 ratio. To assess the effect of the switch on iron status parameters, data from 3 time points before and 3 time points after the switch were analyzed using linear mixed effects models. Subanalyses were done in 2 subgroups of patients anemic or iron deficient at baseline. Results: Hemoglobin increased in all groups (anemic [1.4 g/dL, P < 0.001] iron deficient [0.6 g/dL, P < 0.001]), while the weekly iron dose was significantly lower when patients received FCM compared to IS (48 vs 55 mg/week, P = 0.04). Furthermore, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation increased in all groups (anemic [64 mu g/L, 5.0%, P < 0.001] iron deficient [76 mu g/L, 3.6%, P < 0.001]). Finally, the darbepoetin a dose decreased significantly in all groups (anemic [- 16 mu g/wk., P = 0.01] iron deficient [- 11 mu g/wk., P < 0.001]). Conclusions: In this real-life study in HD patients, a switch from IS to FCM resulted in an improvement of iron status parameters despite a lower weekly dose of FCM. Furthermore, the ESA dose was reduced during FCM, while hemoglobin levels increased.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available