4.1 Article

Characterizing cancer cachexia in the geriatric oncology population

Journal

JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 415-419

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.08.008

Keywords

Cachexia; Sarcopenia; Geriatric oncology; Geriatric assessment; Weight loss; Functional impairment

Funding

  1. Wilmot Foundation
  2. National Cancer Institute [UG1 CA189961, R01 CA177592]
  3. WCI geriatric oncology philanthropy fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Cancer cachexia, characterized by weight loss and sarcopenia, leads to a decline in physical function and is associated with poorer survival. Cancer cachexia remains poorly described in older adults with cancer. This study aims to characterize cancer cachexia in older adults by assessing its prevalence utilizing standard definitions and evaluating associations with components of the geriatric assessment (GA) and survival. Materials and Methods: Patients with cancer older than 65 years of age who underwent a GA and had baseline CT imaging were eligible in this cross-sectional study. Cancer cachexia was defined by the international consensus definition reported in 2011. Sarcopenia was measured using cross-sectional imaging and utilizing sex-specific cut-offs. Associations between cachexia, sarcopenia, and weight loss with survival and GA domains were explored. Results: Mean age of 100 subjects was 79.9 years (66-95) and 65% met criteria for cancer cachexia. Cachexia was associated with impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) (p =.017); no significant association was found between sarcopenia or weight loss and IADL impairment. Cachexia was significantly associated with poorer survival (median 1.0 vs 2.1 years, p =.011). Conclusions: Cancer cachexia as defined by the international consensus definition is prevalent in older adults with cancer and is associated with functional impairment and decreased survival. Larger prospective studies are needed to further describe cancer cachexia in this population. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available