4.1 Article

Falls in men on androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 32-39

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2010.03.004

Keywords

Androgen deprivation; Falls; Prostate cancer; Men; Aged

Funding

  1. Toronto General and Toronto Western Research Fund
  2. Canadian Cancer Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a common treatment for prostate cancer (PC). However, it may increase the risk of falls due to decreases in testosterone, lean body mass and strength. Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. However, the impact of ADT on falls remains unclear. Materials and methods: Three groups matched on age and education were recruited: PC patients starting continuous ADT (ADT users) (n=88), PC patients not receiving ADT (PC controls) (n=86), and healthy controls (n=86). Patients retrospectively reported any falls in the 12 months prior to study entry and prospectively at 3 time points over the next 12 months (after starting ADT). Physical performance measures were done at each time point. The risks of having a fall at both baseline and over 1 year of follow-up were analyzed using logistic regression. Result: At baseline 13.8% (n=36) of patients (ADT users=14.7%, PC controls=8.1%, healthy controls=18.6%, p=0.132) reported falls in the prior year. In the multivariable model, Timed Up and Go, marital status and working status predicted fall risk at baseline. Over 12 months, 24.8% (n=62) of patients (ADT users=34.5%, PC controls=18.1%, healthy controls=21.7%, p=0.035) reported falls. Prior history of falls, being unmarried and arthritis were independent predictors of falls whereas ADT use was borderline (p=0.08). Conclusion: ADT use may be associated with an increased risk of falls, but larger confirmatory studies are needed. Additionally, multiple non-physical factors including prior history of falls and arthritis predict future falls in older men on ADT. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available