4.2 Article

Photoelectric Stimulation of Defined Ear Points (Smokex-Pro Method) as an Aid for Smoking Cessation: A Prospective Observational 2-Year Study with 156 Smokers in a Primary Care Setting

Journal

EUROPEAN ADDICTION RESEARCH
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 292-301

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000329717

Keywords

Cigarette smoking; Smoking cessation; Observational study; Smokex-Pro; Photoelectric stimulation of skin points; Auriculotherapy; General practice; Primary care

Funding

  1. Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Smokex-Pro is a smoking cessation method using a protocol of a standardized consultation and computer-assisted photoelectric stimulation of defined regions in the ear and face. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 156 consecutive adult smokers (81 males, 75 females; mean age 43.8 years; body mass index 25.5; daily cigarettes 24.7; Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence 5; 30 smoking years). The primary end point was the self-reported continuous abstinence rate. Results: Participants completed on average only 32% of recommended visits. A total of 76.7% stopped smoking for more than 7 days. Moreover, 53.4% remained free of smoking for more than 90 days. Long-term abstinence rates were 49.3% (1 year) and 47.95% (2 years). Treatment-related side effects were observed in 24.5% of participants. Side effects were mild and resolved within hours. Conclusion: The Smokex-Pro method appears to be an effective aid for smoking cessation. The treatment was well tolerated and showed only mild and temporary side effects. The average cost of treatment is typically less than EUR 90; the total treatment time is typically 60-90 min. These factors make it an attractive alternative compared to traditional smoking cessation methods. Controlled clinical trials will be needed to confirm the results of this study and refine the treatment for maximum efficacy. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available