4.1 Article

Towards Functional Glycomics by Lectin Histochemistry: Strategic Probe Selection to Monitor Core and Branch-end Substitutions and Detection of Cell-type and Regional Selectivity in Adult Mouse Testis and Epididymis

Journal

ANATOMIA HISTOLOGIA EMBRYOLOGIA
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 481-493

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2010.01019.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. research initiative LMUexcellent
  2. Verein zur Forderung des biologisch-technologischen Fortschritts in der Medizin e. V. (Heidelberg, Germany)
  3. EC [MCRTN-2005-19561]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>The emerging insights into glycan functionality direct increasing attention to monitor core modifications of N-glycans and branch-end structures. To address this issue in histochemistry, a panel of lectins with respective specificities was devised. The selection of probes with overlapping specificities facilitated to relate staining profiles to likely target structures. The experiments on fixed sections of adult murine testis and epididymis were carried out at non-saturating lectin concentrations to visualize high-affinity sites with optimal signal-to-background ratio. They revealed selectivity in lectin reactivity for distinct cell types and segment-dependent staining in the epididymis. Leydig cells, for instance, were reactive with the Sambucus nigra agglutinin and human siglec-2 (CD22), two lectins also separating principal from basal and apical cells in the caput segments I-III of the epididymis. Apical cells were reactive with the Maackia amurensis agglutinin-I, and basal cells with the erythroagglutinin of Phaseolus vulgaris. The reported differences support the concept of lectin staining as cell marker. They thus intimate to study glycogene (genes for glycosyltransferases and lectins) expression and cellular reactivity with tissue lectins. These investigations will be instrumental to assign a role as biochemical signals to the detected staining properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available