4.8 Article

Tuning thiol-ene reactions toward controlled symmetry breaking in polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 1046-1053

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3sc52718b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-0906898, CHE-1012636]
  2. Joint-Hope Education Foundation
  3. Division Of Chemistry
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1012636] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The convenient synthesis of nano-building blocks with strategically placed functional groups constitutes a fundamental challenge in nano-science. Here, we describe the facile preparation of a library of mono- and di-functional (containing three isomers) polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) building blocks with different symmetries (C-3v, C-2v, and D-3d) using thiol-ene chemistry. The method is straightforward and general, possessing many advantages including minimum set-up, simple work-up, and a short reaction time (about 0.5 h). It facilitates the precise introduction of a large variety of functional groups to desired sites of the POSS cage. The yields of the monoadducts increase significantly using stoichiometric amounts of bulky ligands. Regio-selective di-functionalization of the POSS cage was also attempted using bulky thiol ligands, such as a thiol-functionalized POSS. Electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry coupled with travelling wave ion mobility (TWIM) separation revealed that the majority of diadducts are para-compounds (similar to 59%), although meta-compounds (similar to 20%) and ortho-compounds (similar to 21%) are also present. Therefore, the thiol-ene reaction provides a robust approach for the convenient synthesis of mono-functional POSS derivatives and, potentially, of regio-selective multi-functionalized POSS derivatives as versatile nano-building blocks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available