4.5 Article

Identifying medication order discrepancies during medication reconciliation: perceptions of nursing home leaders and staff

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 362-372

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12165

Keywords

medication safety; medication order discrepancies; medication reconciliation; nursing homes

Funding

  1. John A. Hartford Foundation
  2. University of Iowa Gerontological Nursing Intervention Research Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore nursing home leader and staff nurse perceptions about the process of medication reconciliation, with a specific focus on identifying medication order discrepancies. Background Medication order discrepancies and harmful discrepancy-related adverse drug events can occur when residents make the transition to nursing homes, yet little is known about how discrepancies are identified in this setting. Method Interviews of 18 leaders and focus groups of 13 registered nurses and 28 licensed practical nurses from eight mid-western United States nursing homes were conducted. Result Three themes emerged from the data: (1) nurses believe nursing home physicians rely on them to know, (2) active vs. passive information-seeking, and (3) nurses making sense of medication orders to identify discrepancies. Conclusion This study provides evidence about the role of nursing home nurses in medication reconciliation and how nurses engage in cognitive processes, such as 'sensemaking', when identifying discrepancies. Implications for nursing management Nursing leaders and managers must acknowledge that medication reconciliation is a complex cognitive process that requires the right nurse be assigned to the role, taking into account education and experience. Additionally, systems to support collaboration between physicians, nurses and pharmacists should be in place to ensure that potentially harmful discrepancies are identified and resolved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available