4.5 Article

A systematic literature review of nurse shortage and the intention to leave

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 605-613

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01437.x

Keywords

intention to leave; nurses; nursing shortage; review; turnover

Ask authors/readers for more resources

chan z.c.y., tam w.s., lung m.k.y., wong w.y. & chau c.w. (2013) Journal of Nursing Management21, 605613 A systematic literature review of nurse shortage and the intention to leave Aim To present the findings of a literature review regarding nurses' intention to leave their employment or the profession. Background The nursing shortage is a problem that is being experienced worldwide. It is a problem that, left unresolved, could have a serious impact on the provision of quality health care. Understanding the reasons why nurses leave their employment or the profession is imperative if efforts to increase retention are to be successful. Evaluation Electronic databases were systematically searched to identify English research reports about nurses' intention to leave their employment or the profession. Key results concerning the issue were extracted and synthesized. Key issues The diversified measurement instruments, samples and levels of intention to leave caused difficulties in the attempt to compare or synthesize findings. The factors influencing nurses' intention to leave were identified and categorized into organizational and individual factors. Conclusions The reasons that trigger nurses' intention to leave are complex and are influenced by organizational and individual factors. Further studies should be conducted to investigate how external factors such as job opportunities correlate with nurses' intention to leave. Implications for nursing management The review provides insight that can be useful in designing and implementing strategies to maintain a sustainable workforce in nursing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available