4.5 Article

Relational coordination among nurses and other providers: impact on the quality of patient care

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 926-937

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01138.x

Keywords

coordination; interdisciplinary communication; interdisciplinary relationships; nursing; quality

Funding

  1. Division of Nursing (DN)
  2. Bureau of Health Professions (BHPr)
  3. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
  4. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) [D11 HP09752]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The present study examined nurse reports of relational coordination between nurses and other providers and the impact of relational coordination on patient care quality. Background While communication between providers has been traditionally considered important to improve quality, relational coordination extends this view, emphasising the value of high-quality relationships exemplified by shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect; and high-quality communication that is timely, frequent, accurate and problem-solving. Methods Direct care registered nurses (RNs) (n = 747) completed surveys to assess relational coordination across five provider functions and six types of patient care units. Nurses also reported perceptions about patient care quality. Results In all analyses, relational coordination between nurses and other providers was significantly related to overall quality, in the expected directions. As relational coordination increased, nurses reported decreases in adverse events such as hospital-acquired infections and medication errors. Conclusions Enhancing relational coordination between nurses and other providers is central to improving the quality of patient care. Implications for nurse managers and new knowledge The emerging theory of relational coordination provides a useful new research-based framework for managers to use to improve provider relationships, communication and the quality of care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available