4.5 Article

Nurses' intention to leave: critically analyse the theory of reasoned action and organizational commitment model

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 92-99

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00873.x

Keywords

intention to leave; Organizational Commitment model; predicting concepts; Theory of Reasoned Action

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To systematically analyse the Organizational Commitment model and Theory of Reasoned Action and determine concepts that can better explain nurses' intention to leave their job. Background The Organizational Commitment model and Theory of Reasoned Action have been proposed and applied to understand intention to leave and turnover behaviour, which are major contributors to nursing shortage. However, the appropriateness of applying these two models in nursing was not analysed. Evaluation Three main criteria of a useful model were used for the analysis: consistency in the use of concepts, testability and predictability. Key Issues Both theories use concepts consistently. Concepts in the Theory of Reasoned Action are defined broadly whereas they are operationally defined in the Organizational Commitment model. Predictability of the Theory of Reasoned Action is questionable whereas the Organizational Commitment model can be applied to predict intention to leave. A model was proposed based on this analysis. Conclusions Organizational commitment, intention to leave, work experiences, job characteristics and personal characteristics can be concepts for predicting nurses' intention to leave. Implications for Nursing Management Nursing managers may consider nurses' personal characteristics and experiences to increase their organizational commitment and enhance their intention to stay. Empirical studies are needed to test and cross-validate the re-synthesized model for nurses' intention to leave their job.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available