4.6 Article

Ranolazine Improves Angina in Women With Evidence of Myocardial Ischemia But No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 514-522

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.03.007

Keywords

angina; ischemic heart disease; ranolazine; women

Funding

  1. CV Therapeutics/Gilead
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [N01-HV-68161, N01-HV-68162, N01-HV-68163, N01-HV-68164]
  3. National Center for Research Resources [MO1-RR00425]
  4. Gustavus and Louis Pfeiffer Research Foundation, Denville, New Jersey
  5. Women's Guild of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  6. Edythe L. Broad Women's Heart Research Fellowship, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  7. Barbra Streisand Women's Cardiovascular Research and Education Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES We conducted a pilot study for a large definitive clinical trial evaluating the impact of ranolazine in women with angina, evidence of myocardial ischemia, and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND Women with angina, evidence of myocardial ischemia, but no obstructive CAD frequently have microvascular coronary dysfunction. The impact of ranolazine in this patient group is unknown. METHODS A pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial was conducted in 20 women with angina, no obstructive CAD, and >= 10% ischemic myocardium on adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Participants were assigned to ranolazine or placebo for 4 weeks separated by a 2-week washout. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire and CMR were evaluated after each treatment. Invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR) was available in patients who underwent clinically indicated coronary reactivity testing. CMR data analysis included the percentage of ischemic myocardium and quantitative myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI). R E S U L T S The mean age of subjects was 57 +/- 3 11 years. Compared with placebo, patients on ranolazine had significantly higher (better) Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores, including physical functioning (p = 0.046), angina stability (p = 0.008), and quality of life (p = 0.021). There was a trend toward a higher (better) CMR mid-ventricular MPRI (2.4 [2.0 minimum, 2.8 maximum] vs. 2.1 [1.7 minimum, 2.5 maximum], p = 0.074) on ranolazine. Among women with coronary reactivity testing (n = 13), those with CFR <= 3.0 had a significantly improved MPRI on ranolazine versus placebo compared to women with CFR > 3.0 (Delta in MPRI 0.48 vs. -0.82, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS In women with angina, evidence of ischemia, and no obstructive CAD, this pilot randomized, controlled trial revealed that ranolazine improves angina. Myocardial ischemia may also improve, particularly among women with low CFR. These data document approach feasibility and provide outcome variability estimates for planning a definitive large clinical trial to evaluate the role of ranolazine in women with microvascular coronary dysfunction. (Microvascular Coronary Disease In Women: Impact Of Ranolazine; NCT00570089). (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2011;4:514-22) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available