Journal
JOURNAL OF OPTICS
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -Publisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2040-8978/13/4/044020
Keywords
optical tweezers; active calibration; passive calibration; Allan variance; power spectrum; noise; drift; laser
Categories
Funding
- Swedish Research Council
- KU excellence program
Ask authors/readers for more resources
To obtain quantitative information from optical trapping experiments it is essential to perform a precise force calibration. Therefore, sources of noise should be pinpointed and eliminated. Fourier analysis is routinely used to calibrate optical trapping assays because it is excellent for pinpointing high frequency noise. In addition, Allan variance analysis is particularly useful for quantifying low frequency noise and for predicting the optimal measurement time. We show how to use Allan variance in combination with Fourier analysis for optimal calibration and noise reduction in optical trapping assays. The methods are applied to passive assays, utilizing the thermal motion of a trapped particle, and to active assays where the bead is harmonically driven. The active method must be applied in assays where, for example, the viscoelastic properties of the medium or the size or shape of the trapped object are unknown. For measurement times shorter than the optimal calibration time the noise is larger in active than in the passive assays. For times equal to or longer than the optimal measurement time, though, the noise on passive and active assays is identical. As an example, we show how to quantify the influence on measurement noise of bead size and chamber geometry in active and passive assays.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available