4.6 Article

One-step synthesis of Pt-NiO nanoplate array/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for nonenzymatic glucose sensing

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 608-616

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta04724a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21165010, 21465014, 21465015]
  2. Young Scientist Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20112BCB23006, 20122BCB23011]
  3. Foundation of Jiangxi Educational Committee [GJJ13244]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20142BAB203101]
  5. Open Project Program of Key Laboratory of Functional Small organic molecules, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Normal University [KLFS-KF-201214, KLFS-KF-201218]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work reports a one-step synthesis of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) supported platinum-nickel oxide nanoplate arrays (denoted as Pt-NiO/rGO) for nonenzymatic glucose sensing. The prepared Pt-NiO/rGO nanocomposite was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray energy dispersive spectrometry, and X-ray powder diffraction. The existence of a small quantity of Pt could significantly enhance the catalytic activity of NiO and played an important role in controlling the morphology of Pt-NiO nanoplate arrays. The vertical array structure of the Pt-NiO/rGO nanocomposite increased the effective loading of the Pt-NiO catalyst on the electrode surface to some extent. Therefore, the Pt-NiO/rGO modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was successfully used for highly sensitive and selective nonenzymatic glucose detection. The linear range was from 0.008 to 14.5 mM (R-2 = 0.9976, n = 41). The sensitivity was 832.95 mu A cm(-2) mM(-1) and the detection limit was 2.67 mu M (S/N = 3). The good catalytic activity and high sensitivity and stability make the Pt-NiO/rGO/GCE sensor a new kind of hybrid material for the electrochemical detection of glucose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available