4.4 Review

A review of social and environmental barriers to physical activity for adults with intellectual disabilities

Journal

DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 57-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.11.004

Keywords

Physical activity; Barriers; Intellectual disability; Mental retardation; Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There is a higher prevalence of sedentary behavior among adults with intellectual disability (ID) compared to the general population. The majority of research on this topic has focused on assessing physical activity (PA) levels and there are relatively few studies addressing barriers to PA (including exercise) in this population. Objective: It is important to analyze the PA barriers faced by adults with ID in order to develop and implement intervention programs. Methods: A systematic research review was conducted to analyze the barriers to PA for adults with ID. Original research articles published after 1980 with primary intention of identifying PA determinants of age 18+ adults with ID were included. Results: In total, 837 citations were returned, and after screening for repeated articles and inclusion criteria, 7 were included in the analysis. The primary barriers that reoccurred throughout the papers were transportation issues, financial limitations and lack of awareness of options. Other salient barriers included negative supports from caregivers and authority figures (e.g. teachers, coaches and parents) and lack of clear policies for engaging in regular activity in residential and day service programs. Conclusion: This study reveals clear barriers to PA to target. Of primary importance is the development of policies among agencies that serve individuals with ID that could help minimize transportation, financial, policy and educational barriers, which are more modifiable than negative supports. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available