4.6 Article

Health status and health behaviours in neighbourhoods: A comparison of Glasgow, Scotland and Hamilton, Canada

Journal

HEALTH & PLACE
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 331-338

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.11.001

Keywords

Neighbourhood; Health status; Health behaviours; International comparison; Socioeconomic status; Country context

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A540_1022, MC_U130059821] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MC_UP_A540_1022, MC_U130059821] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A540_1022, MC_U130059821] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Health status has been demonstrated to vary by neighbourhood socioeconomic status (SES). However, neighbourhood effects may vary between countries. In this study, neighbourhood variations in health outcomes are compared across four socially contrasting neighbourhoods in Glasgow, Scotland and Hamilton, Ontario Canada. Data came from the 2001 wave of the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Longitudinal Study and a 2000/2001 cross-sectional survey conducted in Hamilton. The results of the comparison point to important variations in the relationship between neighbourhood SES and health. While both cities display a socioeconomic gradient with respect to various measures of health and health behaviours, for some outcome measures the high SES neighbourhoods in Glasgow display distributions similar to those found in the low SES neighbourhoods in Hamilton. Our results suggest that a low SES neighbourhood in one country may not mean the same for health as a low SES neighbourhood in another country. As such, country context may explain the distribution of health status and health behaviours among socially contrasting neighbourhoods, and neighbourhood variations in health may be context specific. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available