4.6 Article

Uniform GeO2 dispersed in nitrogen-doped porous carbon core-shell architecture: an anode material for lithium ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 3, Issue 43, Pages 21722-21732

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta05145b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2015R1D1A3A01019399]
  2. Energy Efficiency & Resources Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy of Korea [20112020100110/KIER B5-2592]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Germanium oxide (GeO2), which possesses great potential as a high-capacity anode material for lithium ion batteries, has suffered from its poor capacity retention and rate capability due to significant volume changes during lithiation and delithiation. In this study, we introduce a simple synthetic route for producing nanosized GeO2 anchored on a nitrogen-doped carbon matrix (GeO2/N-C) via the sal-gel method followed by a calcination process in an inert argon atmosphere. The GeO2/N-C showed superior electrochemical performance over pure GeO2; almost 91.8% capacity retention of 905 mA h g(-1) was shown after 200 cycles at the rate of C/2. Interestingly, even at a high rate of 20C, a specific capacity of 412 mA h g(-1) was retained. This unique anode performance of GeO2/N-C is derived from the effective combination of nano-size Ge02 and its uniform distribution in a nitrogen-doped carbon matrix. Herein, the nitrogen doped-carbon matrix not only strengthens the structure but also promotes the lithium diffusion in the GeO2/C-N material. Further, the adaptability of GeO2/N-C as an anode in a full cell configuration in combination with the LiCoO2 cathode was demonstrated by exhibiting high specific capacity and good cyclability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available