4.6 Article

An effect of Ag(I)-substitution at Cu sites in CuGaS2 on photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical properties for solar hydrogen evolution

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 3, Issue 43, Pages 21815-21823

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta04756k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science & Technology in Japan [26820354]
  2. [24107001]
  3. [24107004]
  4. [2406]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated an effect of Ag(I)-substitution at the Cu sites in CuGaS2 with a chalcopyrite structure on physicochemical, photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical properties. Cu1-xAgxGaS2 (x = 0-0.8) solid solutions possessed 2.34-2.35 eV of band gaps. Ru-loaded Cu1-xAgxGaS2 (x = 0-1.0) powders showed photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution from an aqueous solution containing SO32- and S2- as electron donors under simulated sunlight irradiation. The photocatalytic activity of CuGaS2 (x = 0) was improved, when excess Ga2S3 was added in a starting material for the preparation to give a single phase of a chalcopyrite structure. Cu1-xAgxGaS2 (x = 0.1-1.0) showed higher activity than the CuGaS2 (x = 0), when prepared with the optimum excess Ga2S3. Cu1-xAgxGaS2 (x = 0-0.8) electrodes gave cathodic photocurrents under visible light irradiation, indicating that they possessed p-type characters. Cu0.8Ag0.2GaS2 gave the largest cathodic photocurrent and possessed the most positive onset potential of the cathodic photocurrent among the Cu1-xAgxGaS2 (x = 0-0.8) electrodes. Loading a Ru cocatalyst increased the cathodic photocurrent. Solar water splitting proceeded without an external bias using a photoelectrochemical cell consisting of the Ru-loaded Cu0.8Ag0.2GaS2 photocathode and a CoO-loaded BiVO4 photoanode. Thus, the photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performances of CuGaS2 were improved by Ag(I)-substitution at the Cu sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available