4.6 Article

A monolithic and standalone solar-fuel device having comparable efficiency to photosynthesis in nature

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages 5835-5842

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta06495j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)
  2. University-Institute cooperation program of the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The need for developing sustainable energy sources has generated academic and industrial attention in artificial photosynthesis, inspired by the natural process. In this study, we demonstrate a highly efficient solar energy to fuel conversion device using CO2 and water as feedstock. We developed a thin film photovoltaic technology for the light absorbing component using a low cost, solution based Cu(InxGa1-x)(SySe1-y)(2) (CIGS) module fabrication method to provide sufficient potential for the conversion reactions. Our solar-fuel device uses cobalt oxide (Co3O4) nanoparticle thin film deposited with a low temperature coating method as the water oxidation catalyst and nanostructured gold film as the CO2 reduction to CO generation catalyst. We demonstrated that the integrated monolithic device operated by energy only from sunlight, in an absence of any external energy input. The individual components showed the following abilities: solar-to-power conversion efficiency of 8.58% for the CIGS photovoltaic module photoelectrode, overpotential reduction of water oxidation with the Co3O4 catalyst film by similar to 360 mV at 5 mA cm(-2), and Faradaic efficiency of over 90% by the nanostructured Au catalyst for CO2 reduction to CO. Remarkably, this is the first demonstration of a monolithic and standalone solar-fuel device whose solar-to-fuel conversion efficiency from CO2 and H2O is 4.23%, which is comparable with that of photosynthesis in nature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available