Journal
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
Volume 64, Issue 9, Pages 1373-1381Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/acr.21704
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIH [R01-AR42455-16, N01-AR-4-2271]
- Mary Kirkland Center for Lupus Research
- Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [595989]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective Maternal anti-Ro autoantibodies are associated with cardiac manifestations of neonatal lupus (cardiac NL), yet only 2% of women with this reactivity have an affected child. Identification of a more specific marker would channel intense monitoring to fetuses at greater risk. This study aimed to determine whether autoantibodies against Ro 52 amino acids 200239 (p200) confer added risk over autoantibodies to full-length Ro 52, Ro 60, or La. Methods Anti-Roexposed pregnancies resulting in cardiac NL or no cardiac manifestations were identified from the Research Registry for Neonatal Lupus and the PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation study. Umbilical cord (n = 123) and maternal (n = 115) samples were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results The frequencies of p200, Ro 52, Ro 60, and La autoantibodies were not significantly different between affected and unaffected children. However, neonatal antiRo 52 and Ro 60 titers were highest in cardiac NL and their unaffected siblings compared to unaffected neonates without a cardiac NL sibling. Although both maternal antiRo 52 and p200 autoantibodies were less than 50% specific for cardiac NL, anti-p200 was the least likely of the Ro autoantibodies to be false-positive in mothers who have never had an affected child. Titers of antiRo 52 and p200 did not differ during a cardiac NL or unaffected pregnancy from the same mother. Conclusion Maternal reactivity to p200 does not confer an added risk to fetal conduction defects over full-length Ro 52 or Ro 60 autoantibodies. Mothers who may never be at risk for having an affected child have lower antiRo 60 titers and may require less stringent echocardiographic monitoring compared to women with high-titer autoantibodies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available