4.4 Article

Custom foot orthoses for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review

Journal

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 311-320

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acr.21559

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To identify and critically appraise the evidence for the effectiveness of custom orthoses for the foot and ankle in rheumatoid arthritis. Methods. Studies were identified in appropriate electronic databases (from 1950 to March 2011). The search term rheumatoid arthritis with foot and ankle and related terms were used in conjunction with orthoses and synonyms. Included studies were quantitative longitudinal studies and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case- control trials, cohort studies, and case series studies. All outcome measures were investigated. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria with additional criteria for sample population representativeness, quality of statistical analysis, and compliant intervention use and presence of cointerventions. Meta- analyses were conducted for outcome domains with multiple RCTs. Qualitative data synthesis was conducted for the remaining outcome domains. Levels of evidence were then assigned to each outcome measure. Results. The inclusion criteria were met by 17 studies. Two studies had high quality for internal validity and 3 studies had high quality for external validity. No study had high quality for both internal and external validity. Six outcome domains were identified. There was weak evidence for custom orthoses reducing pain and forefoot plantar pressures. Evidence was inconclusive for foot function, walking speed, gait parameters, and reducing hallux abductovalgus angle progression. Conclusion. Custom orthoses may be beneficial in reducing pain and elevated forefoot plantar pressures in the rheumatoid foot and ankle. However, more definitive research is needed in this area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available