4.4 Article

Morphology and Band Gap Modulation of CdS Quantum Dots Deposited on Reoxidation TiO2 Nanotube Arrays

Journal

SCIENCE OF ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 171-177

Publisher

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/sam.2014.1697

Keywords

TiO2 Nanotube Arrays; Reoxidation; Sequential Chemical Bath Deposition; CdS Quantum Dot; Optical Band Gap; Photocatalytic Properties

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51072001, 51272001]
  2. National Science Research Foundation for Scholars Return from Overseas of Chinese Ministry of Education, State Key Development Program of Basic Research of China [2013CB632705]
  3. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Higher Education Institution of China [KJ2012A023]
  4. Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [212082]
  5. Outstanding Young Scientific Foundation of Anhui University [KJJQ1103]
  6. 211 project of Anhui University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays (TiO2-NTAs), with uniform tube size around 100 nm in diameter and 10 mu m in length, were obtained by means of reoxidation and annealing processes. CdS quantum dots (QDs) were assembled onto the TiO2-NTAs by sequential chemical bath deposition (SCBD). The composition, microstructure, optical and photocatalytic properties of the CdS QDs sensitized TiO2-NTAs were investigated in detail. Compared with the one step oxidation, reoxidation is beneficial to the improvement of morphology of TiO2-NTAs. As the SCBD cycles increase, the band gap of CdS QDs sensitized TiO2-NTAs shifts from 3.09 eV (bare TiO2-NTAs) to 2.81 eV (CdS QDs sensitized TiO2-NTAs with five SCBD cycles). CdS QDs sensitized TiO2-NTAs deposited with five SCBD cycles show the best uniformity of size, space distribution and highest absorbance, and show higher photocatalytic effect comparing with pure TiO2-NTAs under UV-light irradiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available