Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Interpretation of Odds and Risk Ratios
A. M. O'Connor
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE (2013)
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
Jonathan A. C. Sterne et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)
Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses
James R. Carpenter et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified
Julian P. T. Higgins
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
Kerry Dwan et al.
PLOS ONE (2008)
Assessment of methodological quality and sources of variation in the magnitude of vaccine efficacy:: A systematic review of studies from 1960 to 2005 reporting immunization with Moraxella bovis vaccines in young cattle
M. J. Burns et al.
VACCINE (2008)
A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies
Leon Bax et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2007)
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
JPT Higgins et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2003)
How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?
SG Thompson et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis
JPT Higgins et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes
JJ Deeks
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening
JJ Deeks
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2001)
Share Paper
