4.1 Article

Comparison of Hatching Mode in Pelagic and Demersal Eggs of Two Closely Related Species in the Order Pleuronectiformes

Journal

ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 11, Pages 709-715

Publisher

ZOOLOGICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.2108/zs140018

Keywords

hatching enzyme; astacin protease family; demersal egg; pelagic egg; egg envelope

Categories

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [23870025, 24770231]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23870025, 24770230, 24770231, 24570250] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared several characteristics of the pelagic eggs of Verasper variegatus with those of demersal eggs of Pseudopleuronectes yokohamae, both in the order Pleuronectiformes (halibuts or flatfishes). V. variegatus eggs had about twice the diameter of P. yokohamae eggs. However, the total egg protein weight of P. yokohamae was similar to that of V. variegatus. The specific gravity of P. yokohamae eggs was calculated to be 7-fold that of V. variegatus. The difference in size is the main feature distinguishing the two types of egg. The thickness of the egg envelope of P. yokohamae-more than twice that of V. variegatus-must affect the manner of hatching. The amount of hatching enzyme synthesized in pre-hatching embryo was estimated to be larger in P. yokohamae than V. variegatus. The distribution of hatching gland cells differed between the species. In V. variegates embryos, these were located on the yolk sac as a narrow ring-shaped belt, resulting in cleavage of the egg envelope into two parts by digesting a limited region of the egg envelope, called rim-hatching. The hatching gland cells of P. yokohamae embryos were distributed all over the surface of the yolk sac, forming a hole through which the embryo could escape. Thus, the location of the hatching gland cells in pre-hatching embryos varied during the evolution of the Pleuronectiformes, depending on the egg type and manner of hatching.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available