4.1 Article

Mate-locating Behavior of the Butterfly Lethe diana (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): Do Males Diurnally or Seasonally Change Their Mating Strategy?

Journal

ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 821-825

Publisher

ZOOLOGICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.2108/zsj.27.821

Keywords

alternative mating strategy; sexual selection; mating success; territory; butterflies

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mate-locating behavior of male butterflies has been classified into two major types, territorial and patrolling. Territorial males defend a specific site, whereas patrolling males fly around a wider area without having to defend a site. In this study, I investigated the use of these tactics by males of the satyrine butterfly, Lethe diana. A previous study suggested that the males of L. diana change their mate-locating behavior during the day (they patrol in the morning and defend territories in the afternoon) and that patrolling is the primary mating strategy, whereas defending territories is a supplementary one. In the present study, I found that the daily activity pattern of the males of L. diana was similar to that described in the previous study: males often flew around in the morning and competed for territories in the afternoon. However, contrary to the previous study, all courtships and copulations were performed within male territories during their territorial activity. Closer observations revealed that copulations found in male territories were achieved by the owner of the territory. Males tended to feed in the morning, suggesting that the males flying in the morning searched for food rather than females. I conclude that territory holding is the primary male mate-locating tactic in L. diana. I further found that, in summer, males exhibited territorial behavior later than in spring or autumn, which may be a strategy for preventing heat stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available