4.5 Review

Form and function within a phylogenetic framework: locomotory habits of extant predators and some Miocene Sparassodonta (Metatheria)

Journal

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 165, Issue 1, Pages 224-251

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00793.x

Keywords

allometry; comparative methods; geometric morphometrics; locomotion; phylogeny

Categories

Funding

  1. CONICET [PIP 112 200801 01054]
  2. ANPCyT [PICT 26219, 0143]
  3. NSF [0851272, 0824546]
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0824546] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we analysed locomotory habits in extant predators and Sparassodonta species through geometric morphometric techniques and discriminant analyses of the distal humerus in anterior view, proximal ulna in lateral view, and tibia in proximal view. We included a wide sample of extant predators, and considered the phylogenetic and allometric structure in the data sets. We also included some Sparassodonta, a group of carnivorous metatherians that inhabited South America during the Cenozoic, and inferred their locomotory habits. Results suggest the presence of a close relationship between shape and locomotory habits, even after removing the shape component explained by phylogeny in the three postcranial elements. Terrestrial habits were inferred for Arctodictis sinclairi, Borhyaena tuberata, Lycopsis longirostrus, and Thylacosmilus atrox. Some degree of cursoriality was highlighted in B. tuberata and T. atrox, and climbing abilities in L. longirostrus, and to a lesser degree in B. tuberata. Scansorial habits were inferred for Cladosictis patagonica, Sipalocyon gracilis, Prothylacynus patagonicus, and Pseudonotictis pusillus, and in the case of C. patagonica, some digging ability was also tentatively inferred.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available