4.5 Review

Revised systematics of Palaeozoic horseshoe crabs' and the myth of monophyletic Xiphosura

Journal

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 167, Issue 1, Pages 1-27

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00874.x

Keywords

Dekatriata; Euchelicerata; ghost ranges; paraphyly; phylogenetics; Prosomapoda; synziphosurines; tagmosis; Xiphosura; Xiphosurida

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The monophyly of the class Xiphosura is critically re-examined. For the first time a phylogenetic analysis of a number of synziphosurine and xiphosurid taxa is performed together with representatives of the other chelicerate orders also included as ingroup taxa. Xiphosura as currently defined is shown to be paraphyletic, and a revised classification is presented. Previous characteristics used to unite the xiphosurids (possessing a fused thoracetron) and a paraphyletic grade of synziphosurines (retaining freely articulating opisthosomal tergites) include the presence of a cardiac lobe, ophthalmic ridges, an axial region of the opisthosoma, and a reduced first opisthosomal segment. All of these characteristics are, however, here shown to be present in other chelicerate groups, leaving Xiphosura without any defining synapomorphies. A number of other characters, including the form of the chelicerae and appendage VII, indicate that xiphosurans may be paraphyletic with respect to a clade consisting of chasmataspidids, eurypterids, and arachnids. What ramifications this has for the evolution of basal chelicerates is briefly discussed, and it is recognized that most of the currently known synziphosurine taxa represent offshoots from the main chelicerate lineage with ghost ranges extending into at least the Middle Ordovician. (C) 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 167, 1-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00874.x

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available