4.4 Article

The holographic entropy cone

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2015)130

Keywords

Gauge-gravity correspondence; AdS-CFT Correspondence; Black Holes in String Theory; 2D Gravity

Funding

  1. Simons Foundation
  2. FQXi
  3. U.S. DOE [DE-SC0011632]
  4. Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics (Burke Institute) at Caltech
  5. Simons Investigator Award
  6. WPI Initiative of MEXT of Japan
  7. JSPS [26400240]
  8. Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  9. Division Of Physics
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1125565, GRANTS:13982120] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H05895, 26400240] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We initiate a systematic enumeration and classification of entropy inequalities satisfied by the Ryu-Takayanagi formula for conformal field theory states with smooth holographic dual geometries. For 2, 3, and 4 regions, we prove that the strong subadditivity and the monogamy of mutual information give the complete set of inequalities. This is in contrast to the situation for generic quantum systems, where a complete set of entropy inequalities is not known for 4 or more regions. We also find an infinite new family of inequalities applicable to 5 or more regions. The set of all holographic entropy inequalities bounds the phase space of Ryu-Takayanagi entropies, defining the holographic entropy cone. We characterize this entropy cone by reducing geometries to minimal graph models that encode the possible cutting and gluing relations of minimal surfaces. We find that, for a fixed number of regions, there are only finitely many independent entropy inequalities. To establish new holographic entropy inequalities, we introduce a combinatorial proof technique that may also be of independent interest in Riemannian geometry and graph theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available