4.4 Article

A world checklist of Onychophora (velvet worms), with notes on nomenclature and status of names

Journal

ZOOKEYS
Volume -, Issue 211, Pages 1-70

Publisher

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.211.3463

Keywords

Peripatidae; Peripatopsidae; species list; catalogue; taxonomy

Categories

Funding

  1. PhD fellowship of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [290029/2010-4]
  2. SYNTHESYS grant
  3. European Community Research Infrastructure Action FP7 Integrating Activities Programme
  4. Emmy Noether Programme of the German Research Foundation (DFG) [Ma 4147/3-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, the number of valid species of Onychophora is uncertain. To facilitate taxonomic work on this understudied animal group, we present an updated checklist for the two extant onychophoran subgroups, Peripatidae and Peripatopsidae, along with an assessment of the status of each species. According to our study, 82 species of Peripatidae and 115 species of Peripatopsidae have been described thus far. However, among these 197 species, 20 are nomina dubia due to major taxonomic inconsistencies. Apart from nomina dubia, many of the valid species also require revision, in particular representatives of Paraperipatus within the Peripatopsidae, and nearly all species of Peripatidae. In addition to extant representatives, the record of unambiguous fossils includes three species with uncertain relationship to the extant taxa. For all species, we provide a list of synonyms, information on types and type localities, as well as remarks on taxonomic and nomenclatural problems and misspellings. According to recent evidence of high endemism and cryptic speciation among the Peripatidae and Peripatopsidae, previous synonyms are revised. Puta-tive mutations, subspecies and variations are either raised to the species status or synonymised with corresponding taxa. In our revised checklist, we follow the rules and recommendations of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to clarify previous inconsistencies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available