4.2 Article

GPS Determination of Walking Rates in Captive African Elephants (Loxodonta africana)

Journal

ZOO BIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 16-28

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/zoo.20199

Keywords

animal movements; welfare; exercise; enclosure size

Funding

  1. NSF [IIS-0326395]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The movements of elephants in captivity have been ail issue of concern for animal welfare activists and zoological professionals alike in recent years. In order to fully understand how movement rates reflect animal welfare, we must first determine the exact distances these animals move in the captive environment. We outfitted seven adult female African elephants (Loxodonta africana) at Disney's Animal Kingdom with collar-mounted global positioning recording systems to document their movement rates while housed in outdoor guest viewing habitats, Further, we conducted preliminary analyses to address potential factors impacting movement rates including body size, temperature, enclosure size, and social grouping complexity. We found that our elephants moved at ail average rate of 0.409 +/- 0.007 km/hr during file 9-hr data collection periods. This rate translates to an average of 3.68 km traveled during the observation periods, at a rate comparable to that observed in the wild. Although movement rate did not have a significant relationship with,in individual's body size in this herd, the movements of four females demonstrated a significant positive correlation with temperature. Further, females in our largest social group demonstrated it significant increase in movement rates when residing in larger enclosures. We also present preliminary evidence suggesting that increased social group complexity, including the presence of infants in the herd, may be associated with increased walking rates, whereas factors Such as reproductive and social Status may constrain movements. Zoo Biol 28:16-28, 2009. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss. Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available