4.6 Article

Efficacy of the Additional Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages 883-892

Publisher

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/jca.11814

Keywords

concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy; meta-analysis; nasopharyngeal; neoplasms; radiotherapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Health & Medical Collaborative Innovation Project of Guangzhou City, China [201400000001]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Guangzhou City, China [14570006]
  3. National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period [2014BAI09B10]
  4. Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [2013B020400004]
  5. Key Laboratory Construction Project of Guangzhou City, China [121800085]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81302366]
  7. Medical Science and Technology Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [B2013148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Due to the lack of studies, it remains unclear whether the additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is superior to CCRT alone for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The main objective of this Bayesian network meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of NACT+CCRT as compared with CCRT alone. Methods: We comprehensively searched databases and extracted data from randomized controlled trials involving NPC patients who received NACT+CCRT, CCRT, NACT+radiotherapy (RT), or RT. Overall survival (OS) with hazard ratio (HR), and locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and distant metastasis rate (DMR) with relative risks (RRs), were concerned. Results: Nine trials involving 1988 patients were analyzed. In the network meta-analysis, there was significant benefit of NACT+CCRT over CCRT for DMR (RR=0.54, 95% credible interval [CrI]=0.27-0.94). However, NACT+CCRT had a tendency to worsen locoregional control significantly as compared with CCRT (RR = 1.71, 95% CrI = 0.94-2.84), and no significant improvement in OS was found (HR = 0.73, 95% CrI=0.40-1.23). Conclusions: NACT+CCRT is associated with reduced distant failure as compared with CCRT alone, and whether the additional NACT can improve survival for locoregionally advanced NPC should be further explored. Optimizing regimens and identifying patients at high risk of metastasis may enhance the efficacy of NACT+CCRT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available