4.2 Article

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between nifedipine and metformin in rats: competitive inhibition for metabolism of nifedipine and metformin by each other via CYP isozymes

Journal

XENOBIOTICA
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 483-495

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00498254.2011.633177

Keywords

Nifedipine; metformin; drug interaction; competitive inhibition; CYP; rats

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1. It has been reported that hypertension exponentially increases in the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thus, this study was performed to investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between nifedipine and metformin, since both drugs were commonly metabolized via hepatic CYP2C and 3A subfamilies in rats. 2. Nifedipine (3 mg/kg) and metformin (100 mg/kg) were simultaneously administered intravenously or orally to rats. Concentrations (I) of each drug in the liver and intestine, maximum velocity (V-max), Michaelis-Menten constant (K-m), and intrinsic clearance (CLint) for the disappearance of each drug, apparent inhibition constant (K-i) and [I]/K-i ratios of each drug in liver and intestine were determined. Also the metabolism of each drug in rat and human CYPs and blood pressure were also measured. 3. After the simultaneous single intravenous administration of both drugs together, the AUCs of each drug were significantly greater than that in each drug alone due to the competitive inhibition for the metabolism of nifedipine by metformin via hepatic CYP3A1/2 and of metformin by nifedipine via hepatic CYP2C6 and 3A1/2. After the simultaneous single oral administration of both drugs, the significantly greater AUCs of each drug than that in each drug alone could have mainly been due to the competitive inhibition for the metabolism of nifedipine and metformin by each other via intestinal CYP3A1/2 in addition to competitive inhibition for the hepatic metabolism of each drug as same as the intravenous study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available