4.4 Article

Keloid-derived keratinocytes exhibit an abnormal gene expression profile consistent with a distinct causal role in keloid pathology

Journal

WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 530-544

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12060

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Shriners Hospitals for Children [86200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Keloids are disfiguring scars that extend beyond the original wound borders and resist treatment. Keloids exhibit excessive extracellular matrix deposition, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To better understand the molecular basis of keloid scarring, here we define the genomic profiles of keloid fibroblasts and keratinocytes. In both cell types, keloid-derived cells exhibit differential expression of genes encompassing a diverse set of functional categories. Strikingly, keloid keratinocytes exhibited decreased expression of a set of transcription factor, cell adhesion, and intermediate filament genes essential for normal epidermal morphology. Conversely, they exhibit elevated expression of genes associated with wound healing, cellular motility, and vascular development. A substantial number of genes involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition were also up-regulated in keloid keratinocytes, implicating this process in keloid pathology. Furthermore, keloid keratinocytes displayed significantly higher migration rates than normal keratinocytes in vitro and reduced expression of desmosomal proteins in vivo. Previous studies suggested that keratinocytes contribute to keloid scarring by regulating extracellular matrix production in fibroblasts. Our current results show fundamental abnormalities in keloid keratinocytes, suggesting they have a profoundly more direct role in keloid scarring than previously appreciated. Therefore, development of novel therapies should target both fibroblast and keratinocyte populations for increased efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available