4.4 Article

Smoking attenuates wound inflammation and proliferation while smoking cessation restores inflammation but not proliferation

Journal

WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 186-192

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00569.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Research Council [9801273]
  2. Danish Health Insurance Fund
  3. Pfizer, Denmark

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Full-thickness 5 mm punch biopsy wounds were made lateral to the sacrum in 48 smokers and 30 never smokers. After 1 week, the wounds were excised and fixed. The smokers were then randomized to continuous smoking or abstinence with a transdermal nicotine patch or a placebo patch. The sequence of wounding and excision was repeated after 4, 8, and 12 weeks. All excised tissue was stained with hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemically for macrophages (CD68), procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide (PINP) in fibroblasts, and endothelial cells (CD31). The cellularity was assessed and scored by two independent histopathologists, and for the analysis, proportional odds models and random effect models for repeated measurements were applied. Macrophages and PINP-stained fibroblasts were reduced in the smokers' wounds (0.28 [0.14-0.58] [OR, 95%CI]; p=0.01 and 0.37[0.19-0.70]; p < 0.01, respectively, when compared with never smokers' wounds). Inflammation scores were marginally affected. Following smoking cessation, inflammatory cell infiltration and macrophages in the wounds increased. PINP-stained fibroblasts were unaffected. Neovascularization was not affected by smoking or abstinence. Wound inflammation and fibroblast proliferation were attenuated in smokers, suggesting delayed healing. Abstinence from smoking restores inflammation, but does not affect proliferation. These findings suggest a pathophysiologic mechanism for postoperative wound infection and dehiscence in smokers and why smoking cessation appears to reduce wound infection but not dehiscence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available