4.5 Article

The min-dist location selection and facility replacement queries

Journal

WORLD WIDE WEB-INTERNET AND WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 1261-1293

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11280-013-0223-7

Keywords

Spatial database; Geographic information system; Location optimization; Min-dist metric

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP130104587, DP130103705, FT120100832]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT120100832] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose and study a new type of location optimization problem, the min-dist location selection problem: given a set of clients and a set of existing facilities, we select a location from a given set of potential locations for establishing a new facility, so that the average distance between a client and her nearest facility is minimized. The problem has a wide range of applications in urban development simulation, massively multiplayer online games, and decision support systems. We also investigate a variant of the problem, where we consider replacing (instead of adding) a facility while achieving the same optimization goal. We call this variant the min-dist facility replacement problem. We explore two common approaches to location optimization problems and present methods based on those approaches for solving the min-dist location selection problem. However, those methods either need to maintain an extra index or fall short in efficiency. To address their drawbacks, we propose a novel method (named MND), which has very close performance to the fastest method but does not need an extra index. We then utilize the key idea behind MND to approach the min-dist facility replacement problem, which results in two algorithms names MSND and RID. We provide a detailed comparative cost analysis and conduct extensive experiments on the various algorithms. The results show that MND and RID outperform their competitors by orders of magnitude.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available