Journal
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 105-110Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1267-8
Keywords
Aurora; Urinary marker; Biomarker; Cytology; Diagnosis; Cystoscopy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
To evaluate urinary Aurora A Kinase (AURKA) mRNA expression as a diagnostic biomarker for urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). One hundred and eighty-eight urine samples from patients with UBC (n = 122) and controls with hematuria (n = 66) were investigated. AURKA expression was quantified using real-time PCR and compared with voided urinary cytology. Associations with stage and grade were assessed. The area under curve was used to quantify the predictive accuracy (PA). The sensitivity and the specificity of AURKA for UBC were 83.6 and 65.2 %, respectively (PA = 74.4 %). Among those with detectable AURKA, the quantity of expression was similar in cases and controls. Compared with Ta, tumors staged T1 and T2 showed a 9.31-fold and 4.78-fold increased AURKA expression (p = 0.034), respectively. Further, high-grade tumors showed 5.33-fold higher expression levels than low-grade tumors (p = 0.031). AURKA and urinary cytology showed similar overall PA for UBC detection (74.4 vs. 72.1 %, p = 0.588). For low-grade tumors, AURKA was more accurate (72.5 vs. 59.0 %, p = 0.004), while cytology was more accurate for high-grade lesions (76.8 vs. 89.1 %, p = 0.011). In patients with hematuria, AURKA is associated with the presence and grade of UBC, suggesting a role as diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. As AURKA is more accurate in low-grade tumors but less accurate in high-grade tumors than urinary cytology, both could be complementary in detecting UBC.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available