4.5 Article

Update on biofilm infections in the urinary tract

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 51-57

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0689-9

Keywords

Biofilm; Urinary tract infection; Catheter; Encrustation

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R37 AI048689, R01 AI029549, R01 AI048689] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P50 DK064540, R01 DK051406] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Biofilm infections have a major role in implants or devices placed in the human body. As part of the endourological development, a great variety of foreign bodies have been designed, and with the increasing number of biomaterial devices used in urology, biofilm formation and device infection is an issue of growing importance. Methods A literature search was performed in the Medline database regarding biofilm formation and the role of biofilms in urogenital infections using the following items in different combinations: biofilm, urinary tract infection, bacteriuria, catheter, stent, and encrustation. The studies were graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine classification. Results The authors present an update on the mechanism of biofilm formation in the urinary tract with special emphasis on the role of biofilms in lower and upper urinary tract infections, as well as on biofilm formation on foreign bodies, such as catheters, ureteral stents, stones, implants, and artificial urinary sphincters. The authors also summarize the different methods developed to prevent biofilm formation on urinary foreign bodies. Conclusions Several different approaches are being investigated for preventing biofilm formation, and some promising results have been obtained. However, an ideal method has not been developed. Future researches have to aim at identifying effective mechanisms for controlling biofilm formation and to develop antimicrobial agents effective against bacteria in biofilms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available