4.5 Article

Imaging of advanced renal cell carcinoma

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 253-261

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0557-z

Keywords

Renal cell carcinoma; Advanced renal cell carcinoma; Metastatic renal cell carcinoma; Cross-sectional imaging; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrasonography; Positron emission tomography; Angiogenesis inhibitor drugs; Tyrosine-kinase inhibitor drugs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To describe current radiological cross-sectional imaging in the detection and staging of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), defined here as RCC reaching beyond the renal capsule, whether by immediate extension or by metastasis. Review and summary of current radiological and urological literature, including original articles and reviews, retrieved from the medical data base PubMed. Multi-detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) shows a sensitivity of up to 100% and specificity of about 90% for retroperitoneal disease, venous tumour thrombus, and metastasis, but limited accuracy for lymphadenopathy in RCC. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is applied as a problem-solving modality, with particular strength in imaging metastasis to brain and bone. However, dynamic, contrast-enhanced- (DCE-) and arterial-spin-labelling (ASL-) MRI may help to monitor early response to angiogenesis inhibitor drugs. Ultrasonography (US) shows limited capability of identifying retroperitoneal disease, venous tumour thrombus extension, and metastasis. Positron Emission Tomography with 18-fluoro-desoxy-glucose (FDG-PET) demonstrates modest accuracy for metastasis of RCC, with positive studies being suspicious, while negative studies cannot reliably exclude disease. MDCT represents the diagnostic mainstay for the detection and staging of RCC. In the wake of new systemic therapies for advanced RCC, including angiogenesis inhibitor drugs, monitoring treatment response may become a new task for cross-sectional imaging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available