4.5 Article

Bladder tissue engineering through nanotechnology

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 315-322

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0273-0

Keywords

bladder; tissue engineering; regenerative medicine; nanotechnology; self-assembly; supramolecular; scaffold; biomaterial; top-down; bottom-up; stem cell

Funding

  1. NIH [DK072450, T32DK62716]
  2. DAH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The field of tissue engineering has developed in phases: initially researchers searched for inert biomaterials to act solely as replacement structures in the body. Then, they explored biodegradable scaffolds-both naturally derived and synthetic-for the temporary support of growing tissues. Now, a third phase of tissue engineering has developed, through the subcategory of regenerative medicine. This renewed focus toward control over tissue morphology and cell phenotype requires proportional advances in scaffold design. Discoveries in nanotechnology have driven both our understanding of cell-substrate interactions, and our ability to influence them. By operating at the size regime of proteins themselves, nanotechnology gives us the opportunity to directly speak the language of cells, through reliable, repeatable creation of nanoscale features. Understanding the synthesis of nanoscale materials, via top-down and bottom-up strategies, allows researchers to assess the capabilities and limits inherent in both techniques. Urology research as a whole, and bladder regeneration in particular, are well-positioned to benefit from such advances, since our present technology has yet to reach the end goal of functional bladder restoration. In this article, we discuss the current applications of nanoscale materials to bladder tissue engineering, and encourage researchers to explore these interdisciplinary technologies now, or risk playing catch-up in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available