4.6 Article

Meta-analysis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake and prostate cancer risk

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-304

Keywords

Etiology; Meta-analysis; NSAIDs; Prostate cancer

Funding

  1. National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Project of China
  2. key medical disciplines of Zhejiang province
  3. Combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine key disciplines of Zhejiang province [2012-XK-A23]
  4. health sector scientific research special project [201002010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Epidemiological studies of the association between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) intake and the risk of prostate cancer still remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the potential association between NSAID intake and prostate cancer risk. Methods: Eligible studies were retrieved by both computerized searches and reviews of references. Subgroup analyses on country and design of study were also performed. Random or fixed-effect models were used to pool estimates of odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We observed that the intake of aspirin was associated with a marginally decreased risk of prostate cancer (OR =0.95, 95% CI =0.93 to 0.98). A similar result was found between nonaspirin NSAIDs and prostate cancer risk (OR =0.94, 95% CI =0.90 to 0.98). However, a positive relation between all-NSAID intake and prostate cancer risk was observed (OR =1.18, 95% CI =1.15 to 1.22). Conclusions: We observed a marginally inverse correlation between the intake of aspirin and prostate cancer risk. On the contrary, a positive relationship between all-NSAID intake and prostate cancer was detected. Further research needs to be conducted to better clarify potential biological mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available