4.5 Article

Impact of Obesity on Early Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes after Total Gastrectomy with Over-D1 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 1072-1081

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-1942-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of the present study was to assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on perioperative and pathologic outcomes after total gastrectomy with over-D1 dissection for gastric cancer. Data on 161 patients undergoing total gastrectomy between 2005 and 2011 were reviewed. Patients were grouped into three categories by BMI: BMI < 25 kg/m(2) (63 normal-weight patients; 39.1 %), BMI a parts per thousand yen 25-< 30 kg/m(2) (73 overweight patients; 45.3 %), and BMI a parts per thousand yen 30 kg/m(2) (25 obese patients; 15.6 %) and matched for the analysis of perioperative and cancer-related outcomes. Operative time was longer for obese patients. Medical (mainly pulmonary) and surgical (mainly bleeding and wound infection) complications occurred more frequently in overweight/obese subjects. However, they were mostly managed conservatively (grade I-II in the Clavien-Dindo classification). The overall postoperative mortality was 0.9 %. Multivariate analysis identified the American Society of Anesthesiologists score and splenectomy, but not obesity, as independent risk factors for postoperative complications. The median number of lymph nodes retrieved differed significantly from group to group: obese 21 (IQR 18-26), versus overweight 24, versus normal weight 28 (p = 0.031). No difference was found in lymph node ratio and cancer-related parameters. Obese patients with operable gastric cancer can be candidates for standard extensive surgical resection, provided that pre-existing co-morbidities and potential intraoperative and postoperative complications are considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available