4.5 Article

Urapidil in the Preoperative Treatment of Pheochromocytomas: A Safe and Cost-effective Method

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 1141-1146

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-1933-9

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surgery for pheochromocytoma may lead to uncontrolled catecholamine secretion with severe hypertension and cardiac failure. Perioperative alpha(1)-receptor-blockade with orally administered phenoxybenzamine or intravenous urapidil therefore is a standard procedure in the treatment regime prior to surgery. Medical records of 30 patients who underwent surgery for pheochromocytoma during the years 2002-2011 were retrospectively analyzed. We investigated the difference in the clinical course of patients undergoing surgery for pheochromocytoma with either phenoxybenzamine or urapidil pretreatment with special regard to the intraoperative course and length of hospital stay and costs. Nineteen (16 female, 3 male) patients (63 %) received a preoperative alpha-block with orally administered phenoxybenzamine. Eleven patients (6 female, 5 male) (37 %) were treated with intravenous urapidil for 3 days prior to surgery. Intraoperative episodes of hypertension or hypotension did not differ significantly. The median total hospital stay in phenoxybenzamine-treated patients was 17 days in contrast to 11 days in the urapidil group (p = 0.0087). Patients who received i.v. pretreatment spent significantly fewer days in the hospital prior to operation [median: 3 days (range: 3-7 days) versus 9 days (range: 3-21 days); p = 0.0001]. The reduction in the number of days in the hospital in the urapidil group led to a significantly elevated revenue per day (a,not sign637.49/day versus a,not sign412.50/day; p = 0.001). Perioperative treatment with the selective alpha(1) blocker urapidil remains a simple and cost effective method in the treatment regime of patients with pheochromocytoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available