4.5 Article

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in a Public Referral Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi: Spectrum of Disease and Associated Risk Factors

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 1074-1082

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1490-7

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  2. North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute through the NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a valuable tool for diagnosing and treating upper gastrointestinal disease. Prioritizing the use of EGD in resource-limited settings must be customized to local populations to maximize population benefit from the examination. Methods Cross-sectional, retrospective review of EGD reports was conducted at Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), Lilongwe, Malawi. Esophageal tumors were defined as obstructive or nonobstructive and esophageal varices were graded on a scale of I to IV. Descriptive statistics were calculated and logistic regression performed for each disease state compared with all other reports. Results A total of 1,034 cases were reviewed (56% male; mean age (standard deviation), 44 (17) years). The most common indications were dysphagia (37%), hematemesis (21%), and epigastric pain (16%). The most common diagnoses were normal (36%), esophageal cancer (27%), and esophageal varices (17%). Eighty-six percent of esophageal tumors were obstructive and 45% of esophageal varices were grade III or IV. Normal examinations were more likely to be female, younger, and present with dyspepsia. Esophageal cancers were more likely to be male, older, present with dysphagia, and present from districts outside Lilongwe. Esophageal varices were more likely to present with hematemesis. Conclusions EGD is a limited resource at KCH; patient selection should be guided by patient age and indication. The high burden of esophageal cancer and varices in Malawi suggests that therapeutic endoscopy would be beneficial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available