Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study
Ulf S. Nerland et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study
Ulf S. Nerland et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA)
Erland Hermansen et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2013)
The impact of smoking on neurosurgical outcomes A review
Darryl Lau et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY (2013)
Obesity Is Associated With Inferior Results After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Bjorn Knutsson et al.
SPINE (2013)
Smoking and health-related quality of life in English general population: implications for economic evaluations
Matthias Vogl et al.
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH (2012)
CT scan does not predict outcome of mild traumatic brain injury
Katherine Smith
Nature Reviews Neurology (2012)
Who Should Have Surgery for Spinal Stenosis? Treatment Effect Predictors in SPORT
Adam Pearson et al.
SPINE (2012)
Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine?
Tore K. Solberg et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2011)
Smokers Show Less Improvement Than Nonsmokers Two Years after Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Study of 4555 Patients from the Swedish Spine Register
Bengt Sanden et al.
SPINE (2011)
Trends, Major Medical Complications, and Charges Associated With Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Older Adults
Richard A. Deyo et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2010)
Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a balancing act
Richard A. Deyo
SPINE JOURNAL (2010)
Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study
Asgeir S. Jakola et al.
BMC SURGERY (2010)
Disc Height and Segmental Motion as Risk Factors for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
Kyoung-Tae Kim et al.
SPINE (2009)
Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
James N. Weinstein et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2008)
Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain - Towards international consensus regarding minimal important change
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo et al.
SPINE (2008)
Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial
Antti Malmivaara et al.
SPINE (2007)
Subsidence of stand-alone cervical carbon fiber cages
RHMA Bartels et al.
NEUROSURGERY (2006)
Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis:: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy
C Thomé et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE (2005)
Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study
SJ Atlas et al.
SPINE (2005)
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index
M Grotle et al.
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE (2003)
The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly
R Gunzburg et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2003)
Lumbar spinal stenosis:: Conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study
T Amundsen et al.
SPINE (2000)
Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis - Four-year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study
SJ Atlas et al.
SPINE (2000)
Share Paper
