4.5 Article

Strategy for pH control and pH feedback-controlled substrate feeding for high-level production of L-tryptophan by Escherichia coli

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 883-890

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-012-1243-7

Keywords

L-Tryptophan; Escherichia coli; pH control; pH feedback; Acetic acid

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China for Significant New Drugs Creation'' [2008ZX09401-05]
  2. Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Support Program during the Eleventh Five-year Plan Period of China [2008BAI63B01]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT 1166]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optimum production of l-tryptophan by Escherichia coli depends on pH. Here, we established conditions for optimizing the production of l-tryptophan. The optimum pH range was 6.5-7.2, and pH was controlled using a three-stage strategy [pH 6.5 (0-12 h), pH 6.8 (12-24 h), and pH 7.2 (24-38 h)]. Specifically, ammonium hydroxide was used to adjust pH during the initial 24 h, and potassium hydroxide and ammonium hydroxide (1:2, v/v) were used to adjust pH during 24-38 h. Under these conditions, NH4 (+) and K+ concentrations were kept below the threshold for inhibiting l-tryptophan production. Optimization was also accomplished using ratios (v/v) of glucose to alkali solutions equal to 4:1 (5-24 h) and 6:1 (24-38 h). The concentration of glucose and the pH were controlled by adjusting the pH automatically. Applying a pH-feedback feeding method, the steady-state concentration of glucose was maintained at approximately 0.2 +/- A 0.02 g/l, and acetic acid accumulated to a concentration of 1.15 +/- A 0.03 g/l, and the plasmid stability was 98 +/- A 0.5 %. The final, optimized concentration of l-tryptophan was 43.65 +/- A 0.29 g/l from 52.43 +/- A 0.38 g/l dry cell weight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available