4.5 Article

Effects of different nitrogen rich substrates and their combination to the yield performance of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus)

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 1695-1702

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-010-0624-z

Keywords

Lignocellulosic substrate; Nitrogen; Biological supplement; Biological efficiency; Oyster mushroom

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [19255016]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19255016] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to assess the effect of nitrogen (N) variations from lignocellulosic substrates of empty fruit bunch (EFB), palm oil frond (POF), palm oil trunks (POT), A.mangium bark (AB) and Cogongrass (IC), and combinations among them using biological supplements (POF and POT) for suitability as a substrate of P. ostreatus. Three different sets of substrates were evaluated in response to different parameters of P. ostreatus including spawn running, primordial initiation, fruit body yield and biological efficiency (BE). The supplementation of POT and POF generally revealed significant differences on the crop performance of P. ostreatus compared to the un-supplemented substrate. POT demonstrated reduced production time, while POF was the best supplement to promote fresh weight and BE. The most rapid spawn running took place within 18.6 +/- A 0.9 days, while the primordial initiation was observed within 23.2 +/- A 0.5 days in the combination of IC + POT. The most suitable substrate for higher mushroom weight and BE was IC + POF (19.6 +/- A 1.3 g; 70.5 +/- A 5.5%). In addition, the interval between primordial formations was found to be fastest in the un-supplemented EFB and the combination of EFB + POF, which supported a shortened production time. Therefore, IC and EFB appeared to be the better alternative materials for growing P. ostreatus, either with or without any supplementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available